Home News, and the latest updates. Archives Stories from the past... Submit News Got a item of interest? Here's the place to go. Feedback
Your opinion always counts on how we can make GameSurge
even better.
Mailbag Comments on our features, by you, the viewers. |
Hardware Tweaks, reviews and a handy driver index highlight our newest section Reviews Looking to buy one of the hottest games? We have it covered. Previews Get a advanced look at the games of tomorrow. Interviews Find out more about the people behind your favorite game. Strategy Need Help? We have a very large selection of walkthroughs now up. Gallery A special section featuring the best in artwork and
images. |
Editorials
The written word, by staff and viewers.
Game Guy
A bi-monthly column contributed by Mark H Walker, an independant writer in the Gaming community.
Gallery Pictures from around the web.
Hosting Our current hosting plans and features.
Site Information Who we are, what we do, our policies and job positions.
|
PlayStation
The Sony PlayStation, and beyond... Nintendo 64
Currently Down.
Dreamcast The Dreamcast resource, and more. Home of the DC Technical pages. |
|
The Game Guy
By Mark H. Walker
When is Piracy Not?
I chose my words carefully when reviewing games. A couple dozen people
have poured a quite a bit of their time into the ROM I’m looking at. I
value that effort, and won’t unnecessarily devalue their livelihood. By
the same token I never copy ROMs for friends. It’s stealing. Piracy is
the word du jour, but stealing is more to the point. But when is piracy
not?
Is it piracy to copy your own game in order to play it on more
than one computer? Say a PC and traveling laptop. Is it piracy to copy
ROMs to play multiplayer on the owner’s personal LAN? Is it fair for game
companies to tell you how, when, and where you can play that new fifty-dollar
game? I think not.
Yet, as of late I’ve run through spat of games that require their
ROM in the CD-ROM drive to play both single and multiplayer. Last time
I gamed, multiplayer requires, well... multiple players. And if I want
those multiple players to be my daughters on my LAN, that’s my business.
Yet many publishers don’t think so. “You want LAN multiplayer?” they say.
“Buy two games.” Again, I think not.
Games should come with both a full install multiplayer option and a
code that allows limited ROM burning in order to play single player on
more than one computer. Yeah, I guess if the game owner wants to cross
the country, installing games on hard drives from Boise to Baton Rouge,
the publisher will lose money. On the other hand, think of the good will
publishers will generate by sharing their multiplayer suites. It might
just generate enough good will to make them money.
Minority Rule
There’s no Halloween party at my youngest daughter’s school this year.
Right-wing religious groups –ignoring the historical facts behind All Hallows
Eve- have declared the holiday dark, evil, un-Christian. I was stunned,
but my informal survey revealed only a miniscule number of parents were
actually against the party. The vast majority of us feel that a holiday
centered on candy and goofy costumes can’t be all bad. Nevertheless, the
minority rules.
I fear the same is true in computer gaming. The gaming news in
inundated with press releases extolling the next great massively multiplayer
game. Yet only a small fraction (less the 20%) of gamers spend more time
gaming online than off. Reviewers hail the length of biblically proportioned
games such as Baldur’s Gate, yet as the gaming community matures, marries,
and has kids, they will have less and less time for gaming, and hence long
games. The press harps on replay ability, but with the volume of yearly
releases no one has time to replay a game’s opening FMA, let alone the
entire endeavor.
The industry needs to take a hard look at its audience. Despite
each year’s influx of young gamers, the community is aging. Many older
gamers lack the time for MMORPGs, heinously long campaigns/quests, or give
a damn about replying a finished game. Publishers, stop pouring your money
into the minority before the majority wises up and moves on.
Tight Takes
Feels like Diablo, and plays like Crusader: No Remorse... Jowood Publishing’s
Zax: Alien Hunter lets gamers go on a three-quarter isometric alien
bashing rampage. Reflexive Entertainment (the game’s developer) has
hit gamers dead center with this one. Seemingly eschewing any attempt at
originality or creativity, Reflexive drew from all that had come before
and created a simple-don’t-think-just-shoot good time.
There are plenty of weapons, a few simple puzzles to solve, some game
influencing decisions, and a simple story. Most of all there is the type
of almost-brainless fun so lacking from today’s games. Want to relax?
Perhaps take out the day’s frustrations on some poor robotic aliens? Then
this is the game for you.
SSI’s Pool of Radiance flies in the face of the current crop of real-time
role-playing games. So does my opinion. I like it. Granted, I’m playing
the patched version, and I’m only a few hours into the quest, but this
is great stuff for turn-based gamers. Finally, we have a game that allows
gamers to appreciate the breadth and depth of AD&D rules. Rumor has
it that the quest gets tedious, and the coding temperamental, but so far
so good. If you prefer the cerebral pace of turn-based combat to the click
frenzy of real-time role playing you might just like Pool of Radiance.
The Last Word
One more minority opinion... We don’t need God to bless America. We
need God to bless the entire planet. Restore reason to our collective conscience
before there is no collective conscience left.
© Mark H. Walker, LLC 2001
Mark H. Walker is a veteran interactive entertainment journalist who has written over 40 books including his recently released Video Games Almanac and The Parent’s Guide to PlayStation Games.
|
|
|
Zalman: ZM-DS4F Headphones
|
An affordable, ultra-portable headphone set.
more
|
|