Home News, and the latest updates. Archives Stories from the past... Submit News Got a item of interest? Here's the place to go. Feedback
Your opinion always counts on how we can make GameSurge
even better.
Mailbag Comments on our features, by you, the viewers. |
Hardware Tweaks, reviews and a handy driver index highlight our newest section Reviews Looking to buy one of the hottest games? We have it covered. Previews Get a advanced look at the games of tomorrow. Interviews Find out more about the people behind your favorite game. Strategy Need Help? We have a very large selection of walkthroughs now up. Gallery A special section featuring the best in artwork and
images. |
Editorials
The written word, by staff and viewers.
Game Guy
A bi-monthly column contributed by Mark H Walker, an independant writer in the Gaming community.
Gallery Pictures from around the web.
Hosting Our current hosting plans and features.
Site Information Who we are, what we do, our policies and job positions.
|
PlayStation
The Sony PlayStation, and beyond... Nintendo 64
Currently Down.
Dreamcast The Dreamcast resource, and more. Home of the DC Technical pages. |
|
Black Icemat Review - Page 2
Performance and Comparison:
The Icemat does a great job whether the task is aiming for
headshots in UT2004 or micromanaging 30 different units in Warcraft 3. The
minimal friction from the pad allows excellent tracking of moving units as well
as extremely precise movements and adjustments of the cursor or crosshair. Of
course it also works great for graphics designers who frequently use CAD or
other graphics programs. The amount of friction (or rather, lack of it) is perfect to provide excellent control,
and the surface provides excellent tracking accuracy.
I have never experienced a problem of running out of surface space
when using the pad – in fact there is enough room to use a corner as a
drink coaster.
The performance of the Icemat is fairly similar to the
Steelpad. At a similar price it is tough to pick out the better pad, as they
both have slight advantages and disadvantages over each other. In the end,
it may come down to a personal preference of looks and design in deciding
a winner.
Firstly, compared with the performance that plastic based mouse pads provide,
both pads simply sweep the competition under the carpet.
The slick, hard surfaces
will definitely outlast any other computer component, which means you will
never need to purchase a replacement, and I doubt that they will
warp through age or general temperature conditions. However, the
Icemat obviously needs to be treated with care as it is made out of glass, but
it does not appear to be at any risk of breaking through normal use.
The Icemat is slightly quieter than the Steelpad, although
there is still a small amount of noise from the movement. I also found that it
does slide more smoothly and has the least friction of any mouse pad I have
tried. In terms of very fine movement the Steelpad probably has a slight edge
as I found the mouse movement is marginally more accurate for very small
adjustments.
One small factor, and the main reason I am using the Icemat
over the Steelpad at the moment is that the pad does not get as cold – it is
Winter here at the moment, and placing the palm of my hand on the Steelpad can
feel somewhat icy. Of course the
reverse may be true in mid summer when a cool surface is a refreshing change.
Conclusion:
The Icemat definitely stands out up at the top end of the
professional mousepad market. Not only does it look great, this pad delivers pinpoint accuracy and easily lives up to the slogan of "sliding perfection".
Once again the only prohibitive factor I can think of is the
price tag. You've either got to be made of serious cash or be a gaming enthusiast, but the Icemat
may be well worth the cost for those seeking top performance
and a product that will never need replacement.
Final Score: 90%
|
|
|
Zalman: ZM-DS4F Headphones
|
An affordable, ultra-portable headphone set.
more
|
|