News, and the latest updates.
Stories from the past...
Got a item of interest? Here's the place to go.
Your opinion always counts on how we can make GameSurge
Comments on our features, by you, the viewers.
Tweaks, reviews and a handy driver index highlight our newest section
Looking to buy one of the hottest games? We have it covered.
Get a advanced look at the games of tomorrow.
Find out more about the people behind your favorite game.
Need Help? We have a very large selection of walkthroughs now up.
A special section featuring the best in artwork and
The written word, by staff and viewers.
A bi-monthly column contributed by Mark H Walker, an independant writer in the Gaming community.
Pictures from around the web.
Our current hosting plans and features.
Who we are, what we do, our policies and job positions.
The Sony PlayStation, and beyond...
The Dreamcast resource, and more. Home of the DC Technical pages.
GameGuy: The ďWho Counts Polygons?Ē Edition
By Mark H. Walker
Sandra Bullockís lips, F-14s flying wing tip to wing tip 20 feet off a
steel-gray ocean, and Michael Andrettiís champ car scrambling for traction as
it dives through Laguna Secaís Corkscrew. In short, Iím a visual kind of guy.
My optical fantasies are not, however, confined to corporeal reality. The dark halls
of Deux Ex trace a cold finger along
my spine and the glistening hoods of NASCAR 2002 stockers drop my jaw.
Iím impressed by the way things look. Itís important to me --important, but not
crucial. Unfortunately, thatís an emotion not widely shared in this industry.
Seems to me development teams sometimes spend an inordinate amount of time
beautifying their baby. Hence we get a large number of beautiful, yet mediocre,
games (Can you say Hostile Waters: Antaeus Rising?).
are several answers. Hey, we all like pretty stuff. Thatís why Rosanne Barr
never made it as a poster child. And that is a prime reason developers and
publishers alike sink lots of time and money into their pixels and polygons.
Face it, the visual and audio ambiance of Grand Prix Legends did much to throw you into the cockpits of
those Ferraris and Lotuses (Lotii?). So too do the knotty yellow wisp-snakes of
Baldur Gate IIís Entangle spell convince the gamer that Jaheira has in
fact rendered her target motionless.†
Bottom line, graphics are one of the ingredients that create an
immersive game world.
the graphical emphasis is our own fault. Since graphics are an important
ingredient, we discuss them in the gaming press. And you can bet that anything
that receives continuous coverage in the press is going to make publishers sit
up and take notice. Flip to any review/preview (mine included), and youíll
find a section on graphics. The same cannot be said for †a gameís user manual, dialogue, voice
acting, scenario design, or artificial intelligence (please donít email me with
every exception to this rule that you find on the Internetís thousand-odd game
sites), yet each of those is an important element.
visceral pleasure that graphics provide and their high profile are
understandable justifications to dump time and money into pixels and polygons.
Those, however, arenít the only reasons, there is one that is rarely discussed,
one that few, if any, developers would admit. A reason so contrary to good game
development that it might never occur to many gamers. The reason is simple:
Making games pretty is easy.
not dissiní artists. No doubt making a characterís breasts so large that she
becomes a pop star is hard work --ask any transplant specialist, but nearly
every development studio has a core of proficient artists. The same canít be
said for game designers; thereís a couple dozen on the planet --Sid Meier, John
Romero, Tim Cain, and whomever else you like. Hence, when you donít have the
design talent itís easier to concentrate on the eye candy.
easier to concentrate on, but easier to sell as well. Developers have to demo
these games to their publishers --a.k.a. the people who pay the bills.
Sometimes these publisher folks are gamers themselves and ask germane
questions, other times they either have little experience in the genre or lack
the time to learn what makes the game tick. So, what looks good is what sells
good to the publishers, and what sells good is what garners the development
same token, graphics are easy for journalists to evaluate. Whereas critiquing
the combat routines of a role-playing game†
--or† physics engine of a racing
simulation-- takes a considerable amount of experience, commenting on the
fluttering leaves in the trees of the latest Test Drive offering takes
no skill, just eyes. And make no mistake, in an Internet age, experienced gaming
journalists/editors are a thinly-spread breed.
graphics are king (or queen in Ms. Croftís case). Often for good cause --after
all, they enhance the game, but just as often graphical emphasis --whether in a
game or the review thereof-- is a result of developers and journalists taking
the easy way out. When that happens we all lose, as long as game publishers
think that high screen resolution means better gaming, weíll get a swarm of
beautiful also-rans each year --games that might have been successful if less
time had been spent on polygons and more on play. Because in the long run,
despite graphicís glitz, itís the depth of play that sells games. After all,
itís what Sandra Bullock speaks that counts... at least thatís what my wife
© Mark H. Walker, LLC 2001
H. Walker is a veteran interactive entertainment journalist who has written
over 40 books including his recently released Medal of Honor and Wizardry 8
Zalman: ZM-DS4F Headphones
An affordable, ultra-portable headphone set.